Now your main claim of impartiality I can agree with but that goes for any personal analysis I make. If the results were wrong I would still analyze them and come to a conclusion why/how they were wrong instead. I count on what it says only because i can logically explain the results and agree with them. It could give me entirely false results and I could still use it because by the simple action of thinking about the results and the questions they pose I learn about myself. I analyze what it says knowingly the result is distorted I decide myself what is true or not. There is trained personal in hospitals, and you can always appeal to a therapist. If you're gonna take it, which seems inevitable, take it as it is: a chart of incomplete and slightly distorted results, with no interpretation from a professional given yet.ĭo you want a real diagnosis? You really think something is going on with you or just want to really know more about you? Go to a proffesional. The results are worst than those any recreative test online could give you.Īnyway, after all. So, even if you don't take the results seriously it's still absurd! you still count on what it says! When it's an incomplete, distorted version of the original test. The results you're getting are raw and incomplete.ģ. Also the test itself has a validity scale)Ģ. (If you're going to say something about the validity guide, it's useless. Why? Because of the self bias, the self mirror effect that impossibilities you to get an imparcial view of your personality. So the results you're getting are wrong from the begining. First of all I think this test shouldn't be self administrated, it's not designed to be so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |